7 He proclaimed, “One more powerful
than I am is coming after me; I am not worthy to bend down and untie the strap
of his sandals. 8 I baptize you with water, but he will baptize
you with the Holy Spirit.”
John’s
message is one of a coming man who will have power; one to whom John has
already declared himself a servant (by his unworthiness to untie his sandals);
a man whose ministry will surpass his own in every way. Where John is only able
to ritually cleanse with water, this person will bring a spiritual cleansing. John’s
message of baptism by the Holy Spirit is also a foreshadowing beyond the scope
of the Gospel narrative. The Holy Spirit doesn’t make many appearances in Mark.
The few times where it is mentioned after this point are in connection with
Jesus and the power or authority that he possesses. The baptism of other people
with the Holy Spirit is an event that will take place after the resurrection,
and is not recorded in this Gospel.
The
audience, as believers, would have been familiar with the concept of the Holy
Spirit. This is an aspect of theology that was developed by the time Paul was
writing his letters (roughly a decade before Mark was written down), and
Christian communities all over the Mediterranean, even in Rome, would have
understood what was meant when the term Holy Spirit is used in a Gospel. For
example:
·
Romans
8:14-16 explains adoption as children of God through the Holy Spirit
·
Romans
8:26-27 discusses the Spirit interceding on behalf of the saints
·
Romans
9:1 indicates that the Holy Spirit can assure one’s conscience of the truth
9 Now in those days Jesus came from
Nazareth in Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan River. 10 And
immediately coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens splitting apart and
the Spirit descending on him like a dove. 11 And a voice came
from heaven: “You are my one dear Son; in you I take great delight.”
We have
already been told that Jesus is the Christ and Son of God, so he needs no
further introduction. The “prologue,” as it were, is over, and Mark launches
directly into the narrative of Jesus’ ministry. The Gospel
of Mark is roughly divided into a 3-Act structure, much like an ancient drama.
Act 1 (1:9-8:26) is Jesus’ Galilean ministry – it is very action-oriented, it demonstrates
Jesus’ authority and identity, and it puts his message at odds with the
religious authorities (the scribes, teachers of the Law, and Pharisees). Act 2
(8:27-13:37) transitions to Jerusalem and Jesus’ last week. Here the focus
shifts to Jesus teaching his disciples, preparing them for his absence, and
forcing them (and the audience) to confront and answer the question, “Who do
you say that I am?” Act 3 (14:1-16:8) is the climax of the story, the point
that the narrative has been relentlessly pushing toward, the culmination of
Jesus’ ministry through his suffering and death, and the ending.
Verse 10
introduces us to one of the first recurring themes we will encounter in Mark: Immediacy. The Greek word
meaning “immediately” is used over 40 times in the Gospel. The action in Mark
(especially Act 1) is fast paced, constantly driving the audience forward to
the climax of the story. There are very few “rest breaks.” Another literary
motif presented in these verses is that of Patterns of Three. In Mark,
things frequently happen in threes: here, Jesus sees heavens opened, he sees
the Spirit descending, and he hears a voice.
Examining
the narrative itself, the vision at the baptism is written as a personal
experience intended for Jesus alone, and not in any way a demonstration to the
crowd. He sees the heavens splitting
open. The voice speaks to him and not to the crowd: “You are my son... in you...”
No mention is made of anyone else beyond Jesus hearing the voice or seeing the
Spirit descend. There is also no indication in the text that John recognized
Jesus as the one he had been prophesying about, or that he saw or heard the
vision.
The
internal narrator of the Gospel, however, allows the audience to take part in
an omniscient perspective. Frequently, we are given glimpses into information
of which the characters inside the narrative are unaware. This is one such
example. We get to experience the vision of the Spirit and voice along with
Jesus, and by doing so, we know that Jesus is the one of whom John was
speaking. The Spirit descends on Jesus because the audience has been told that
he will ultimately baptize with it. And just as the OT quotations in v.2-3 were
immediately followed with their embodiment in John the Baptist, John’s
declaration of the coming person of power is immediately followed by its
fulfillment in Jesus.
Additionally,
Mark’s baptism episode contains hints of proto-adoptionist theology. Rather
than the belief that Jesus was fully divine from birth or before, Adoptionism believed
that Jesus was “adopted” by God at his baptism due to his devotion to God, and
that he was given divine status and the Holy Spirit because
of this adoption, but that he is not equal to God the Father. This doctrine was declared to
be a heresy by the 1st Council of Nicaea (325 AD), but some ideas in
parts of Mark and Paul’s letters can be seen as precursors to this doctrine.
Other Gospel writers may have noticed this potential theological issue present
in Mark, and dealt with it in different ways. For example, Matthew has the
voice at the baptism address the crowd (“This is my son”), rather than Jesus,
changing the purpose of the event to a public declaration and indicating that
Jesus already knew his identity. Luke includes the account of 12-year-old Jesus
declaring God to be his father, years before his baptism. Both Matthew and Luke
include birth narratives in which a divine messenger informs Jesus’ parents
that he is God’s son by miraculous pregnancy, and thus divine from his birth.
John’s prologue places Jesus as the Word, preexistent and coeternal with God.
Mark
does not include any of this clarifying information, making his theology a
little more uncertain. Does the voice speak because Jesus was not aware of his
identity before the baptism? Was Jesus a regular man until God declared his
adoption as the Son of God and sent the Spirit into Jesus? Is God simply
declaring his approval at Jesus’ submission to God through baptism? Is the
voice intended to inform Jesus that it was time to begin his ministry? Is the
voice a literary construct intended for the reader and not for anyone inside
the narrative, including Jesus? Reading Mark independently, I don’t know that
you can fully answer these questions, but try to keep them in mind as we read through
the rest of the Gospel to see whether anything can be resolved or clarified.
Another question
that may have arisen in your mind is why the Son of God would need to be
baptized? Wasn’t John’s baptism one of repentance for the forgiveness of sins?
Does this indicate that Jesus had sins that needed forgiveness? 2 Corinthians 5:21 states: “God
made the one who did not know sin
[Jesus] to be sin for us, so that in him we would become the righteousness of
God.” Paul
wrote this letter most likely between 55-57 AD, which means that this is the
earliest point at which we can declare for certain that the doctrine of a
sinless Jesus existed in early Christian theology. If we accept the date of
Mark as written in the late 60’s then the theological belief of Jesus as
sinless would have existed for a decade or more, enough time for the doctrine (even
if it was not present everywhere), to be circulated and adopted by the
communities around the Mediterranean.
The
other Gospel writers also seem to have noticed this as an issue in need of
explanation in the baptism narrative. Matthew 3:14-15 includes an interaction
between John and Jesus, in which John tries to prevent Jesus from being
baptized and states that Jesus needs to baptize him instead, but Jesus
convinces him that it needs to happen “to fulfill all righteousness.” Luke
3:21-23 alters the structure of the events slightly, making the baptism happen
after everyone else present was also baptized (v.21 “it happened that, when all
the people were baptized, Jesus also was baptized”); having the vision happen
as Jesus prays, rather than as he exits the water, thus taking the emphasis off
of the baptism itself (v.21 “and while he was praying, the heavens opened...”);
and using the event as a symbolic action marking the beginning of his ministry
(v.22-23 “‘...in you I take great delight;’ and so Jesus, when he began his
ministry, was about thirty years old.”). The Gospel of John does not even
record Jesus being baptized.
A common
explanation attempting to answer the “why baptism” question is that Mark, who
greatly emphasizes the humanity of Jesus, has Jesus undergo a baptism in order
to declare himself a full member of humanity. A second explanation paints
Jesus’ baptism as a symbolic action announcing his willingness to accept the
sinfulness of mankind on his shoulders as part of his ultimate mission to
suffer and die as Son of God and Christ. Another explanation highlights one of the
main purposes of the Gospel of Mark as teaching what it means to be a true
follower of Jesus, frequently using Jesus to model the behaviors expected of
his followers. Thus, Jesus undergoes a baptism as a model for what future
disciples would be expected to do when following in his footsteps. A final
explanation (though not in any way the last) views this narrative as another
combination of OT quotations, constructed for the audience and declaring the
identity of Jesus to the reader just as the OT quotations in v.2-3 declared who
John the Baptist was.
·
Psalm 2:7
-- I
will proclaim the Lord’s
decree:
He said to me, “You are my son;
today I have become your father.
today I have become your father.
·
Isaiah 42:1 -- “Here
is my servant whom I support,
my chosen one in whom I take pleasure.
I have placed my spirit on him;
he will make just decrees for the nations.
my chosen one in whom I take pleasure.
I have placed my spirit on him;
he will make just decrees for the nations.
The
placing of the Spirit on Jesus immediately afterward would also serve as a
fulfillment of the Isaiah verse for the reader, just as John immediately shows
up in the story after Malachi and Isaiah are quoted, and Jesus arrives
immediately after John predicts the man of power. Ultimately, whether you think
any (or none) of these explanations holds water, I leave it up to you to decide
why you think Jesus was baptized.
No comments:
Post a Comment